Home › Database › Postgres Too Many Clients — PgBouncer Pool Fix
Intermediate 5 min · September 23, 2026

Postgres Too Many Clients — PgBouncer Pool Fix

Fix Postgres sorry-too-many-clients by pooling with PgBouncer, sizing max_connections, and pruning idle sessions.

N
Naren Founder & Principal Engineer

20+ years shipping high-throughput database systems. Written from production experience, not tutorials.

Follow
✓ Production
production tested
September 23, 2026
last updated
1,942
articles · all by Naren
Before you start⏱ 12 min
  • ✓A Postgres server with superuser or monitoring access
  • ✓An app fleet with per-instance connection pools
  • ✓Basic comfort reading pg_stat_activity output
 ● Production Incident 🔎 Debug Guide
⚡Quick Answer
  • FATAL sorry, too many clients already means demand beat max_connections (default just 100) — each connection is a full backend process with real memory behind it
  • Group pg_stat_activity by state and application_name: idle and idle-in-transaction rows are holders doing nothing, and they're the safe ones to prune
  • Put PgBouncer in transaction-pooling mode between apps and Postgres so hundreds of app threads share a small set of real server connections
  • Size app pools to fit the new budget and add idle_in_transaction_session_timeout so abandoned transactions die instead of camping for hours
✦ Definition~90s read
What is Postgres Too Many Clients Fix?

max_connections caps backend processes (default 100 — far lower than most teams assume), and superuser_reserved_connections (default 3) holds emergency slots for superusers, your break-glass entry during a full house. Raising max_connections costs memory per backend (work_mem, maintenance buffers, and overhead multiply), so 500+ connections need real RAM math — the ceiling is a memory decision wearing a config value's clothes.

★
Think of Postgres as a small restaurant with 100 seats where every guest gets a personal waiter (a backend process).

pg_stat_activity is the roster: every backend with its user, application_name, client address, state (active, idle, idle in transaction, disabled), and current query. The states tell the story: active rows are real work; idle rows are pool reservations; idle in transaction rows are the dangerous ones — holding locks and snapshots while the app does something else.

Grouping by state and application names the misconfigured pool in one query, and pg_terminate_backend(pid) reclaims individual slots.

PgBouncer changes the architecture instead of the arithmetic. In transaction-pooling mode it holds thousands of lightweight client connections and multiplexes them onto a small pool of real server connections, assigning a server backend only for the duration of each transaction.

Hundreds of app threads share tens of Postgres backends; idle app threads cost nothing server-side. The trade-offs are explicit: prepared statements, LISTEN/NOTIFY, and advisory locks behave differently per mode, so transaction mode needs driver settings (no server-side prepares) that you set once and forget.

Plain-English First

Think of Postgres as a small restaurant with 100 seats where every guest gets a personal waiter (a backend process). Your apps keep sending tour buses — each microservice holds dozens of empty seats 'just in case'. Sorry, too many clients is the host's FULL sign. PgBouncer is the lounge: hundreds of guests check in there, and a small crew of waiters serves whoever is actually eating right now (transaction pooling). Nobody waits outside and the kitchen never sees more tickets than it can cook.

FATAL: sorry, too many clients already. Postgres says it flatly and hangs up — no queue, no waiting room, just a refused connection. It lands during deploys, autoscale events, and cron stampedes: the database is calm, queries are fast, and nothing can connect. With the default max_connections of 100, it takes remarkably little to fill the house.

Each Postgres connection is a forked backend process with its own memory — there is no cheap thread to hand out. App pools that look modest per instance multiply across pods into demand the server can't honor, and idle-in-transaction sessions camp on slots for hours while doing nothing.

This guide covers the drill and the architecture: confirming saturation in pg_stat_activity, pruning idle holders safely, inserting PgBouncer in transaction mode, sizing app pools to the new budget, and adding timeouts so the house can't fill with ghosts again. The same drill rescues cron stampedes, runaway reporting jobs, and deploys that forgot the pooler — connection exhaustion always rhymes.

The Error Means the Doorman Is Full

Sorry, too many clients already is Postgres refusing at the door: backend count hit max_connections and your connection wasn't a superuser with a reserved slot. There's no queue and no graceful degradation — the server hangs up mid-handshake. With the 100 default, a single service with 10 pods × 10 pool slots fills the house alone, before cron, replicas, humans, or the second microservice open a thing.

Confirm with three numbers from a superuser session: max_connections (the ceiling), superuser_reserved_connections (the fire escape, default 3), and count(*) from pg_stat_activity (current occupancy). Full house with calm CPU is the signature — it separates connection exhaustion from every query-performance problem instantly, and it tells the team to stop tuning SQL and start counting holders.

Memory is the reason the ceiling stays low. Each backend carries its own work_mem allotments, buffers, and process overhead; 400 real backends need gigabytes that 100 never did. Raising the ceiling without RAM math converts refused connections into swapping and OOM kills — the incident that takes down existing backends too. Budget the ceiling for memory, then fit demand under it with pooling.

confirm_full_house.sqlSQL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
-- Ceiling, fire escape, current occupancy
SHOW max_connections;
SHOW superuser_reserved_connections;
SELECT count(*) AS backends FROM pg_stat_activity;

-- Occupancy by state (holders vs real work)
SELECT state, COUNT(*) AS n
FROM pg_stat_activity
GROUP BY state
ORDER BY n DESC;
📊 Production Insight
A team tuned queries for an hour against 12% CPU before counting backends: 100 of 100, mostly idle. The fix was roster management, not query plans.
🎯 Key Takeaway
Full house plus calm CPU means count holders, not queries — confirm ceiling, reserves, and occupancy first.

pg_stat_activity: Who Holds the Slots

pg_stat_activity is the complete roster: pid, user, application_name, client address, state, and current query per backend. Group by state first — active is real work, idle is pool reservations, idle in transaction is the dangerous middle: a transaction holding locks and an xmin horizon (blocking VACUUM) while the app does something else entirely. Twenty-five such rows from one reporting job can stall a whole database while looking like nothing.

Group by application_name second to name the owner. One service with 200 idle rows is an oversized pool; fifty crons with 3 each is a leak pattern; a human psql idle in transaction for 40 minutes is a forgotten console holding production locks. The idle_for computation (now() - state_change) ranks victims for termination: oldest idle first, since nothing real can have waited that long.

Snapshot the grouped output into the ticket before terminating anything. It justifies the pool change ('service X held 312 of 400 slots in Sleep') and preserves evidence that evaporates the moment backends die. Terminate from data, and let the roster rank your targets. Re-run the grouping after each prune round — the falling top row proves you are draining the real culprit, not a symptom.

roster_backends.sqlSQL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
-- Holders by state, user, and application (biggest group = culprit)
SELECT state, usename, application_name, COUNT(*) AS n
FROM pg_stat_activity
GROUP BY 1, 2, 3
ORDER BY n DESC;

-- Oldest abandoned transactions first (termination candidates)
SELECT pid, usename, application_name, client_addr,
  now() - state_change AS idle_for, query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE state = 'idle in transaction'
ORDER BY state_change
LIMIT 20;
📊 Production Insight
One grouped query showed a reporting job holding 25 idle-in-transaction backends with 40-minute ages — locks and vacuum horizon included. The pooler discussion started that minute.
🎯 Key Takeaway
Group by state then application: the biggest idle group names the pool to shrink, the oldest transactions name the sessions to end.

Terminate Safely: pg_terminate_backend

pg_terminate_backend(pid) kills the whole backend: connection gone, open transaction rolled back, locks released. For idle rows that's pure recovery — nothing real dies. For idle in transaction it abandons the transaction, which is usually exactly what you want (the app forgot it), at the cost of rolling back whatever it had staged. Check the query column first so you know what you're discarding; a 40-minute 'SELECT * FROM huge' in a forgotten console is safe, a migration's DDL is not.

Prefer pg_cancel_backend(pid) for active runaways: it stops the query but keeps the connection, so the app's pool slot survives and no reconnect storm follows. Reserve terminate for idle states, and never script blanket termination of active backends — murdering 50 running checkouts to free slots converts a connection incident into a data and retry incident.

Terminate oldest-first in small batches, re-checking occupancy between rounds. Each batch frees slots for the app immediately, and stopping once recovery begins leaves innocent holders alive. Log every terminated pid with its idle age and query — the postmortem needs the list, and 'we killed 60 ghosts' reads better with receipts attached for the review.

prune_backends.sqlSQL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
-- Reclaim idle holders older than 10 minutes (pure recovery)
SELECT pg_terminate_backend(pid)
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE state = 'idle'
  AND now() - state_change > interval '10 minutes';

-- Abandoned transactions: inspect first, then terminate
SELECT pid, now() - state_change AS idle_for, query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE state = 'idle in transaction'
ORDER BY state_change
LIMIT 20;
-- SELECT pg_terminate_backend(12345);  -- run per pid after review

-- Active runaway: cancel the query, keep the connection
-- SELECT pg_cancel_backend(12345);
⚠ Terminate Idle States, Cancel Active Ones
pg_terminate_backend on active backends kills running work and triggers reconnect storms. Cancel active queries with pg_cancel_backend; reserve terminate for idle and idle-in-transaction rows you've reviewed.
📊 Production Insight
An engineer terminated 50 active checkouts to 'free slots fast' — the rollback and retry wave hurt more than the outage. Idle-first batching is now the runbook rule.
🎯 Key Takeaway
Terminate reviewed idle rows oldest-first in batches; cancel (don't kill) active runaways.

PgBouncer Transaction Pooling

PgBouncer in transaction mode is the architectural fix: thousands of lightweight client connections in, a small pool of real server connections out, with a backend assigned only for each transaction's duration. Statement boundaries return the backend to the pool, so idle app threads cost zero server slots. A fleet that needed 380 direct backends runs on default_pool_size 25 without noticing — autoscaling stops owning your connection count.

The modes matter. Session pooling pins a backend per client (safe, barely multiplexes). Transaction pooling multiplexes per transaction (the standard choice) but forbids server-side prepared statements, LISTEN/NOTIFY, and advisory locks across statements on the same backend. Statement pooling goes further and breaks transactions outright — never use it for app traffic. Know which guarantees your drivers need, then pick the strongest multiplexing that preserves them.

Configure conservatively and observe. default_pool_size 20–25 per database, reserve_pool_size 5 for bursts, max_client_conn in the thousands, and server_idle_timeout to release unused backends. Point app DSNs at port 6432, watch SHOW POOLS (cl_waiting vs sv_idle), and grow the server pool only when clients genuinely wait while backends sit idle — which, after app pools shrink, is rare.

pgbouncer_setup.shBASH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
# /etc/pgbouncer/pgbouncer.ini (transaction multiplexing)
# [databases]
# shop = host=db-primary port=5432 dbname=shop
# [pgbouncer]
# listen_port = 6432
# pool_mode = transaction
# default_pool_size = 25
# reserve_pool_size = 5
# max_client_conn = 1000
# server_idle_timeout = 60

# Observe the multiplex: clients waiting vs backends idle
psql -h pooler -p 6432 pgbouncer -c 'SHOW POOLS;'
psql -h pooler -p 6432 pgbouncer -c 'SHOW CLIENTS;' | head -20

# App DSN points at the pooler, not Postgres directly
# postgresql://app:secret@pooler:6432/shop
📊 Production Insight
Routing through transaction-mode PgBouncer cut real backends from 380 demanded to 25 used — same traffic, same pods, full house gone in 6 minutes.
🎯 Key Takeaway
Transaction pooling multiplexes thousands of clients onto tens of backends — set driver caveats once, then scale pods freely.

App Pool Sizing That Fits the New Budget

Behind a pooler, app pools shrink dramatically: maximumPoolSize 5 per pod is plenty when PgBouncer multiplexes, because the app pool now manages checkout latency, not server slots. The fleet equation becomes pods × 5 plus headroom under the pooler's max_client_conn — numbers that stay boring through 3× autoscale events. Keep minimumIdle at 1–2 so quiet pods release even pooler-side slots.

Disable server-side prepared statements in drivers behind transaction-mode poolers: JDBC prepareThreshold=0, Npgsql with matching settings, SQLAlchemy/psycopg2 already client-side by default. A backend reassigned mid-session can't honor a prepare from its previous tenant — the errors look bizarre (prepared statement does not exist) until you know the mode changed underneath the driver.

Roll the change service by service, watching SHOW POOLS after each: sv_used should stay flat while cl_active absorbs the load. If clients wait (cl_waiting climbs) while backends idle, grow default_pool_size slightly; if backends saturate, the app pools are still too generous. The pooler dashboard, not vibes, sizes the final numbers. Document the per-service pool values next to the PgBouncer config so the next autoscale review starts from facts.

app_pool_budget.shBASH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
#!/bin/bash
# Fleet budget behind PgBouncer: pods x 5 + headroom < max_client_conn
set -euo pipefail
PODS=$(kubectl get deploy api -o jsonpath='{.status.replicas}')
echo "pods=$PODS x 5 = $((PODS * 5)) app slots vs max_client_conn=1000"
cat > application.properties << 'EOF'
spring.datasource.hikari.maximum-pool-size=5
spring.datasource.hikari.minimum-idle=1
spring.datasource.hikari.connection-timeout=30000
# JDBC behind transaction-mode PgBouncer: no server prepares
# spring.datasource.hikari.data-source-properties.prepareThreshold=0
EOF
echo "wrote application.properties (max 5, idle 1)"
💡Shrink App Pools After Adding the Pooler
Teams add PgBouncer but keep maximumPoolSize 20 — multiplexing nothing. Cut app pools to 5 per pod and disable server-side prepares, or the pooler is decoration.
📊 Production Insight
One service kept pool 20 behind the new pooler and still spiked cl_waiting — cutting to 5 flattened it. The pooler only multiplexes what apps release.
🎯 Key Takeaway
Cut app pools to ~5 per pod behind PgBouncer, disable server prepares, and roll service by service watching SHOW POOLS.

Prevention: Timeouts, Alerts, and Driver Hygiene

Server-side timeouts bound every leak class at once. idle_in_transaction_session_timeout ('60s') kills abandoned transactions that hold locks and vacuum horizons; statement_timeout ('30s') stops runaway queries before they camp; idle_session_timeout (PG 14+) reaps forgotten consoles. Set all three via ALTER SYSTEM plus reload so they survive restarts — session-level SETs evaporate with the connection that set them.

Alert on the two predictive graphs: total backends over 75% of max_connections, and any idle-in-transaction older than 5 minutes. The first warns of the cliff; the second names tomorrow's lock incident today. Export pg_stat_activity states to your metrics (one gauge per state) so dashboards show the house filling by category instead of a single scary number.

Audit driver hygiene per deploy: application_name set per service (the roster is useless without it), prepared-statement settings matching the pooler mode, and no per-request connections bypassing pools. Connection behavior deserves the same review rigor as SQL — the prettiest query still 500s when there is no backend to run it. Review connection settings with the same checklist rigor as schema migrations — both fail loudly at 2 AM.

guardrail_timeouts.sqlSQL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
-- Kill abandoned transactions + runaways server-side (persistent)
ALTER SYSTEM SET idle_in_transaction_session_timeout = '60s';
ALTER SYSTEM SET statement_timeout = '30s';
SELECT pg_reload_conf();

-- Predictive alert queries (wire to monitoring)
SELECT count(*) AS backends FROM pg_stat_activity;
SELECT pid, now() - state_change AS idle_for, query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE state = 'idle in transaction'
  AND now() - state_change > interval '5 minutes';
📊 Production Insight
A 60-second idle-in-transaction timeout now kills abandoned sessions before they age into lock incidents — two alert classes silenced by one setting.
🎯 Key Takeaway
Persist server-side timeouts, alert at 75% occupancy plus 5-minute abandoned transactions, and tag every connection with application_name.
● Production incidentPOST-MORTEMseverity: high

Autoscale Doubled Pods and Filled 100 Slots in 4 Minutes

Symptom
At 6:02 PM autoscaling grew the API fleet 15 to 38 pods for a flash sale. By 6:06 PM every new connection got FATAL sorry, too many clients already — checkout, auth, and webhooks all down, 410 refused connections per minute. Postgres showed 12% CPU. The pooler-less architecture meant 38 pods × 10 pool slots = 380 direct backends demanded against a 100-slot server, plus 25 idle-in-transaction sessions from a reporting job that never committed.
Assumption
The team assumed the sale had overloaded the database and failed over to the standby — which inherited the identical 100-slot ceiling and the identical storm, failing in 90 seconds. Then they raised max_connections to 400 live, which admitted the flood into 400 real backends; memory pressure spiked, the OOM killer took the postmaster's neighbor, and the failover they'd just completed had to be redone.
Root cause
Pure connection arithmetic with no pooling layer: per-pod pools summed to 380 direct backends against max_connections 100. The reporting job's 25 idle-in-transaction sessions held locks on top, slowing the few queries that got through. Every fix attempt added backends (failover, ceiling raise) instead of multiplexing demand — feeding the storm more of what it was already choking on.
Fix
They routed traffic through the standby PgBouncer (already running for reads) in transaction mode with default_pool_size 25, pointed app DSNs at port 6432, and checkouts recovered in 6 minutes. Then they cut app pools to 5 per pod, set idle_in_transaction_session_timeout to 60s, and killed the abandoned reporting sessions. PgBouncer became mandatory path for all services the next sprint, with SHOW POOLS on the pooler dashboard.
Key lesson
  • Multiplex before you multiply: a pooler absorbs pod-count growth by design, while direct connections turn every autoscale event into connection roulette.
  • Reserve and rehearse emergency entry: superuser slots plus a tested break-glass login are the only way to prune from inside a full house.
  • Fix demand architecture, not ceilings: raising max_connections fed 400 real backends into memory pressure — pooling cut real backends to 25 for the same traffic.
Production debug guideSix steps from refused connections to a multiplexed, budgeted fleet.6 entries
Symptom · 01
Apps report FATAL: sorry, too many clients already
→
Fix
Confirm the ceiling and occupancy: SHOW max_connections; SHOW superuser_reserved_connections; then SELECT count(*) FROM pg_stat_activity; If count sits at max_connections with low CPU, the house is full of holders, not work. Enter through a superuser (reserved slots) — psql 'dbname=shop host=db-primary user=breakglass' — since superusers bypass the last reserved connections.
Symptom · 02
Inside — who holds all the backends?
→
Fix
Group the roster: SELECT state, usename, application_name, COUNT(*) FROM pg_stat_activity GROUP BY 1,2,3 ORDER BY 4 DESC; The biggest idle or idle in transaction group names the oversized pool. Drill into the worst: SELECT pid, usename, application_name, client_addr, state, now() - state_change AS idle_for, query FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE state = 'idle in transaction' ORDER BY state_change LIMIT 20;
Symptom · 03
Idle holders identified — reclaim slots without killing real work
→
Fix
Terminate idle backends oldest-first: SELECT pg_terminate_backend(pid) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE state = 'idle' AND now() - state_change > interval '10 minutes'; For idle in transaction, check the query first — terminating abandons its transaction (rolls back, releases locks, usually the desired outcome). Never blanket-terminate active backends; use pg_cancel_backend(pid) to stop a runaway query while keeping its connection.
Symptom · 04
Same storm returns with every deploy or scale event
→
Fix
Check the pooler layer: if PgBouncer fronts the database, run SHOW POOLS; and SHOW CLIENTS; against the pgbouncer admin database (psql -h pooler -p 6432 pgbouncer) — cl_waiting climbing while sv_idle sits empty means the server-side pool is undersized; raise default_pool_size modestly. If no pooler exists, that absence is the diagnosis: every pod holds direct backends and autoscaling owns your connection count.
Symptom · 05
App pools sized for direct connections meet the new pooler
→
Fix
Shrink per-pod pools hard — with PgBouncer multiplexing, maximumPoolSize 5 per pod is plenty — and disable server-side prepared statements in drivers (e.g., prepareThreshold=0 for JDBC, pgbouncer mode gotchas for Npgsql) since transaction mode reassigns backends per transaction. Redeploy one service, watch SHOW POOLS sv_used stay flat, then roll the fleet.
Symptom · 06
Recovered — keep ghosts from refilling the house
→
Fix
Set guardrail timeouts: ALTER SYSTEM SET idle_in_transaction_session_timeout = '60s'; ALTER SYSTEM SET statement_timeout = '30s'; then SELECT pg_reload_conf(); These kill abandoned transactions and runaway queries server-side. Alert on total backends over 75% of max_connections and on any idle-in-transaction older than 5 minutes — the two graphs that predict every recurrence.
Postgres Connection Exhaustion at a Glance
Root CauseHow to ConfirmFixPrevention
Per-pod pools sum past max_connectionsGrouped pg_stat_activity: one app, hundreds idlePgBouncer transaction mode + pool cutsFleet budget gate; pooler mandatory path
Idle-in-transaction sessions campingidle_for in minutes/hours with open xactTerminate reviewed pids; 60s timeoutidle_in_transaction_session_timeout + alerts
Ceiling raised without RAM mathBackends grow, memory/OOM followsRevert ceiling; multiplex insteadSize max_connections for memory, fit demand under
No pooler; autoscaling owns countDemand tracks pod count exactlyDeploy PgBouncer, point DSNs at 6432Pooler in the reference architecture
Leaked per-request connectionsMany distinct backends, short ages, one appFix handle lifecycle; use poolsReview connection hygiene per deploy
⚙ Quick Reference
6 commands from this guide
FileCommand / CodePurpose
confirm_full_house.sqlSHOW max_connections;The Error Means the Doorman Is Full
roster_backends.sqlSELECT state, usename, application_name, COUNT(*) AS npg_stat_activity
prune_backends.sqlSELECT pg_terminate_backend(pid)Terminate Safely
pgbouncer_setup.shpsql -h pooler -p 6432 pgbouncer -c 'SHOW POOLS;'PgBouncer Transaction Pooling
app_pool_budget.shset -euo pipefailApp Pool Sizing That Fits the New Budget
guardrail_timeouts.sqlALTER SYSTEM SET idle_in_transaction_session_timeout = '60s';Prevention

Key takeaways

1
Too-many-clients is a full house
confirm ceiling, reserves, and occupancy first.
2
pg_stat_activity grouped by state and app names the pool to shrink.
3
Terminate reviewed idle rows; cancel active runaways; never blanket-kill work.
4
Transaction-mode PgBouncer multiplexes hundreds of clients onto tens of backends.
5
Cut app pools to ~5 behind the pooler and disable server-side prepares.
6
Persist idle/statement timeouts and alert at 75% occupancy.

Common mistakes to avoid

5 patterns
×

Raising max_connections instead of pooling

Symptom
Storm admitted into hundreds of real backends; memory pressure and OOM follow.
Fix
Multiplex with PgBouncer; size the ceiling for RAM and fit demand beneath it.
×

Blanket-terminating active backends

Symptom
Running checkouts die; rollbacks and retries amplify the incident.
Fix
Terminate idle states only; cancel active queries with pg_cancel_backend.
×

Keeping app pools huge behind the pooler

Symptom
cl_waiting climbs though the pooler exists — nothing is actually multiplexed.
Fix
Cut app pools to ~5 per pod and disable server-side prepares.
×

Using transaction mode with server prepares on

Symptom
Bizarre 'prepared statement does not exist' errors under load.
Fix
Set prepareThreshold=0 (JDBC) or driver equivalent; prepares can't survive backend reassignment.
×

No application_name on connections

Symptom
Roster shows 300 anonymous backends — owner unknown, pruning is guesswork.
Fix
Set application_name per service in every DSN; require it in deploy review.
INTERVIEW PREP · PRACTICE MODE

Interview Questions on This Topic

Q01JUNIOR
What does 'sorry, too many clients already' mean?
Q02SENIOR
How do you find who holds 300 Postgres connections?
Q03SENIOR
pg_terminate_backend vs pg_cancel_backend — when each?
Q04SENIOR
Why does transaction-mode PgBouncer break server-side prepared statement...
Q05SENIOR
Design connection architecture for 50 autoscaled pods on a 100-slot Post...
Q01 of 05JUNIOR

What does 'sorry, too many clients already' mean?

ANSWER
Backend count hit max_connections (default 100) — a capacity refusal, not slow queries. Full house with calm CPU is the fingerprint; count holders in pg_stat_activity.
FAQ · 6 QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

01
What should max_connections be?
02
Why didn't failover fix our connection storm?
03
Is it safe to terminate idle backends?
04
Session, transaction, or statement pooling?
05
Do I still need app pools with PgBouncer?
06
Which timeouts should every server have?
N
Naren Founder & Principal Engineer

20+ years shipping high-throughput database systems. Written from production experience, not tutorials.

Follow
✓ Verified
production tested
September 23, 2026
last updated
1,942
articles · all by Naren
🔥

That's PostgreSQL. Mark it forged?

5 min read · try the examples if you haven't

←
Previous
Postgres Relation Does Not Exist Fix
3 / 3 · PostgreSQL
Next
ORA-00904 Invalid Identifier Fix
→